School of Life Sciences

Morrow Lab

flies on an orange flies on a vial correlation matrix plot

Evolutionary Genetics of Sexual Conflict

We are interested in understanding more about the nitty gritty of sexual conflict. An understanding of sexual conflict at a more detailed level will clarify how sexual dimorphism evolves (or doesn't) and whether sexually antagonistic can contribute to the maintenance of genetic variation.

Some of the specific questions that we are trying to answer include (but are not limited to): which particular traits are embroiled in sexual conflict? How important is sexually antagonistic selection relative to other forms of selection? How has the genome been shaped by it, and our current focus - which particular genes experience sexually antagonistic selection?

We are currently using two systems to try to answer these questions. In the lab we work with the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, for which there is such a wealth of genetic tools and knowledge. We are also using human datasets to examine specifically whether we can detect patterns of sexual antagonism in contemporary populations.

Our research program is dependent upon an active and enthusiastic team together with some expert collaborators. We also have generous support from The Royal Society, The European Research Council, and the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsådet).

Ted Morrow (January 2013)

Royal Society logo   European Research Council logo   Swedish Research Council logo

Preprints from the lab

The evolution of sex differences in disease genetics
William P Gilks, Jessica K Abbott, Edward H Morrow

Contact

Dr Ted Morrow

Ted Morrow portrait

Royal Society University Research Fellow
Email: ted.morrow@sussex.ac.uk
Tel: +44 1273 87 28 62
Twitter: @ted_morrow

Twitter

Evolutionary biologist, sexual antagonism, sexual conflict, Royal Society University Research Fellow #morrowlab, tweet for @SussexBiology @SexualConflict

@Dianora_1 @drwollastonmp I don't think that's the rational alternative, so no.

@Dianora_1 @drwollastonmp correct but the mtDNA will be changed- epistasis between the 2 genomes will be changed tedmorrow.wordpress.com/2014/06/30/eth…

@drwollastonmp this May interest you about the conclusions of that review tedmorrow.wordpress.com/2014/09/01/my-…

@drwollastonmp but it is genetic modification

massive contradiction to claim faulty mitochondria cause range of diseases (phenotype) but don't change physical characteristics (phenotype)

Visit ted_morrow on Twitter

Twitter feed from @SexualConflict

RSS Feed of Sexual Conflict and Sexual Antagonism papers :: curated by @ted_morrow

Models of speciation: where are we now? dlvr.it/6kF1F2

The Sexual Cascade and the Rise of Pre-Ejaculatory (Darwinian) Sexual Selection, Sex Roles, and Sexual Conflict. dlvr.it/6kF18Z

Insights into the preservation of the homomorphic sex-determining chromosome of Aedes aegypti from the discovery... dlvr.it/6dFnv9

The polycystic ovary syndrome evolutionary paradox: a GWAS-based, in silico, evolutionary explanation. dlvr.it/6XJMRV

Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism. dlvr.it/6WmSPG

Visit SexualConflict on Twitter