How do cells make decisions during cell cycle and meiosis?
Wednesday 27 June 13:00 until 14:00
GDSC Seminar Room
Speaker: Prof Bela Novak,Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford Uni
Part of the series: GDSC Weekly Seminars
Prof Bela Novak
Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK
Cell cycle progression in eukaryotes is controlled by a seemingly universal protein interaction network composed of protein kinases and phosphatases, transcription factors, ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, and stoichiometric inhibitors. These molecular interactions embody a dynamical system that (when all is well) oscillates once per cell cycle. When genomic integrity is in jeopardy, however, the oscillation ceases immediately at checkpoints until the problem can be resolved. Fundamental for the cell cycle oscillation is the negative feedback loop by which Cdk1/CycB promotes CycB degradation via activation of APC/C (Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome). We are arguing that bistable (‘toggle’) switches are also important design principles of eukaryotic cell cycle control network. A bistable switch arises as a consequence of positive or double-negative feedback loops. A bistable switch is characterized by two alternative steady states which could represent active and inactive states of a regulatory molecule, corresponding to different phases of the cell cycle. Bistable cell cycle switches provide conceptual framework for unidirectional progression through the cell cycle and underlie G1/S and G2/M transitions [1] as well as Start/Restriction Point and mitotic exit [2]. The meta/anaphase transition guarded by the spindle assembly checkpoint is also characterized by a ‘toggle’ switch [3]. I will also discuss the prophase/metaphase I transition of budding yeast meiosis based on our collaboration with Wolfgang Zachariae’s lab (MPI, Martinsried).
References:
[1] Novák, B., Tyson, J.J., Győrffy, B. & Csikász-Nagy, A. Nature Cell Biology (2007) 9: 724-728.
[2] Lopez-Avilés, S., Kapuy, O., Novák, B. & Uhlmann, F. Nature (2009) 459: 592-595.
[3] He, E., Kapuy, O. Oliveira, R., Uhlmann, F., Tyson, J.J. & Novák, B. (2011) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 10016-10021.
By:
Last updated: Friday, 25 May 2012