Evaluating Access and Participation Plan (APP) interventions

Browse our range of widening participation projects, which aim to improve equality of opportunity for underrepresented groups.

Our projects 

The Research and Evaluation team have developed theories of change for all our APP interventions, and evaluation plans to test and refine those theories. These can be viewed below.

As we move through evaluation implementation, our findings will be made available through our repository and this page.

Email the Research and Evaluation team if you have any questions about these projects.

Browse project descriptions and accompanying documents, grouped into the following categories:

Access (Pre-entry)

These programmes increase access to higher education for students who have been eligible for free school meals at school, as well as for other underrepresented groups in HE, including those from Gypsy, Roma, Traveller, Showmen and Boater (GRTSB) backgrounds and those with experience of care. 

Success (On-course)

These programmes address current gaps in on-course outcomes for students with a declared mental health condition, mature students, students who have been eligible for free school meals (FSM), and students from Black, Asian and mixed-heritage backgrounds.

Progress (Graduate outcomes)

These programmes reduce the gap in progression into highly skilled work or higher study for students with a declared mental health condition, and students domiciled in postcodes from the lowest quintile in the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). 

The APP Research and Evaluation team

We monitor and evaluate the impact of the University’s widening participation and student success initiatives. We work closely with delivery teams to ensure our interventions are evidence-led and effectively support our students from pre-entry through to graduation.

Our team

Robyn Long, Head of APP Research and Evaluation.

Joseph Waghorne, Research and Evaluation Manager (Evidence).

Jenny Diggins, Research and Evaluation Manager (Qualitative).

Mauricio Rivera, Research and Evaluation Manager (Quantitative). 

Julie Shepherd, Research and Evaluation Officer. 

Email us at evaluation@sussex.ac.uk

Academic Advisory Group

The Academic Advisory Group (AAG) provides guidance to the Research and Evaluation team to support us in building a robust and reliable evidence base for effective decision-making.

AAG members give detailed and expert advice on a range of academic, research-related, ethical, methodological, technical or wider issues related to evaluations.

Members of the AAG are appointed to two-year terms. All of our evaluation plans and reports are peer-reviewed by the AAG.

The Academic Advisory Group is chaired by Dr Matthew Easterbrook. 


You might also be interested in: