Research outputs

Dienes, Z. (forthcoming). The inner workings of Registered Reports. In A. L. Nichols & J. E. Edlund (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yhp2a

Parsons, S., Azevedo, F., Elsherif, M. M., Guay, S., Shahim, O. N., Govaart, G. H., Norris, E., O’Mahony, A., Parker, A. J., Todorovic, A., Pennington, C. R., Garcia-Pelegrin, E., Lazić, A., Robertson, O., Middleton, S. L., Valentini, B., McCuaig, J., Baker, B. J., Collins, E., … Aczel, B. (2022). A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4

Stewart, S. R., Pennington, C. R., Silva, G. F. A., Ballou, N., Butler, J., Dienes, Z., Jay, C., Rossit, S., & Samara, A. (2021). Reforms to improve reproducibility and quality must be coordinated across the research ecosystem: The view from the UKRN Local Network Leads. BMC Research Notes, 15(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05949-w

Colling, L. J., & Szűcs, D. (2021). Statistical inference and the replication crisis. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12, 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0421-4

Sladekova, M., Webb, L. E. A., & Field, A. P. (in-press). Estimating the change in meta-analytic effect size estimates after the application of publication bias adjustment methods. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000470

Lakens, D., Adolfi, F. G., Albers, C. J., Anvari, F., Apps, M. A. J., Argamon, S. E., Baguley, T., Becker, R. B., Benning, S. D., Bradford, D. E., Buchanan, E. M., Caldwell, A. R., Calster, B. V., Carlsson, R., Chen, S.-C., Chung, B., Colling, L. J., Collins, G. S., Crook, Z., … Zwaan, R. A. (2018). Justify your alpha. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0311-x

Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., Cesarini, D., Chambers, C. D., Clyde, M., Cook, T. D., Boeck, P. D., Dienes, Z., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C., … Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z

Field, A. P., & Wilcox, R. R. (2017). Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.013

Dienes, Z. (2021). How to use and report Bayesian hypothesis tests. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practise, 8(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bua5n

Dienes, Z. (2021). Obtaining evidence for no effect. Collbra: Psychology, 7(1), Article 28202. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.28202

Dienes, Z. (2019). How do I know what my theory predicts? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919876960

Dienes, Z., & Mclatchie, N. (2018). Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1266-z

Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781

Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920

Colling, L. J., Szűcs, D., Marco, D. D., Cipora, K., Ulrich, R., Nuerk, H.-C., Soltanlou, M., Bryce, D., Chen, S.-C., Schroeder, P. A., Henare, D. T., Chrystall, C. K., Corballis, P. M., Ansari, D., Goffin, C., Sokolowski, H. M., Hancock, P. J. B., Millen, A. E., Langton, S. R. H., … McShane, B. B. (2020). Registered replication report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Sciences, 3(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920903079

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

South East of England Replication in Psychology Syndicate (SERPS)

The School of Psychology is part of the South East of England Replication in Psychology Syndicate (SERPS) along with University of Reading, University of Essex, Royal Holloway (University of London) and University of Surrey. The purpose of SERPs is to foster multi-site collaborations between the five universities.

Information for University of Sussex staff. You'll need University of Sussex login to access.