Department of Education

Ethics

Introduction

The University of Sussex is committed to promoting and upholding the highest quality academic and ethical standards in all its activities. A university-wide Research Governance Committee Framework has been established to ensure that ethical review procedures:

  • reflect best practice with regard ethical considerations in research
  • meet legislative, regulatory and funder requirements
  • safeguard the reputation of the University

Under the new framework, ethical governance of research undertaken in the School of Education and Social Work is overseen by the Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities Cross-School Research Ethics Committee (C-REC).

Direct responsibility for ethical review of research lies in part with the C-REC and in part with the School - as outilned below. Ethical review within Schools and by C-REC is overseen by the central University Research Governance Committee (URGC), which is responsible for broader policy decisions relating to research governance and ethics. The URGC also regularly reviews policies relating to the ethics of research to ensure that they are comprehensive, accessible, relevant and up to date.

This page provides an overview of research ethics procedures and processes for application and review, with links to University and School-based guidance and resources. Tailored guidance providing detail for ESW staff and students can be found in the following documents:

 

Ethical review procedures

Research which does not involve humans - or personal information about them - or animals and presents no other risk does not require ethical review.

Where ethical review is required, there are different pathways depending on whether the project is of low or a higher risk. Guidance on the Research Governance website and below explains the distinctions. Please note that these distinctions concern the characteristics of the research project, not the researcher. So ethically sound applications can be approved whether for low or high risk research.

Low risk projects

Ethical review of low risk projects is carried out at two levels:

  • Undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate taught (PGT) student projects are reviewed at School level
  • Staff and postgraduate research (PGR) student projects are reviewed by the Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities C-REC (application forms to be submitted online via Sussex Direct - see details below)

Low risk group projects

Where a number of undergraduate or postgraduate taught students might seek to conduct research of a low-risk nature and of a sufficiently similar nature to each other to be reviewed together, a single ethics application can be submitted by the Course Leader on behalf of the group. Guidance and an application form for blanket approvals can be found on the university's Research Governance website.

Exceptional cases for low risk review

Exceptionally, projects may be submitted for low risk review even if they do not appear to meet all the low risk criteria (see section A of the online application form). The commonest example of this for research undertaken within the School of Education and Social Work is where research involves children who are not in any particular way vulnerable and the research topic itself is non-sensitive.

Higher risk projects

All staff and student (UG, PGT, PGR) higher risk projects are reviewed by the C-REC. (There is also a specialised university-wide committee that considers any research which involves non-human/animal subjects).

 

People and roles

The following individuals are responsible for managing the ethical review procedures:

Staff, Research Students and High Risk
Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities C-REC Chair: Dr Elaine Sharland
E: E.Sharland@sussex.ac.uk

Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities C-REC representative for ESW: Dr Janet Boddy
E: J.M.Boddy@sussex.ac.uk

Undergraduate and Taught Postgraduate Low Risk
ESW School Research Ethics Officer (SREO): Vanessa Regan
E: V.Regan@sussex.ac.uk

ESW Ethical Review Administrator: Dr Yugin Teo
E: Y.S.Teo@sussex.ac.uk

 

Applying for research ethics review

All applications - by staff or students - for research ethics review are submitted online using the Application Form for Ethical Review (this is a link to the relevant page on Sussex Direct for which you will need to log in using your username and password).
NOTE: The old/former application form and procedure will continue to operate alongside the new system until 20th September 2012.
For more details about the new system, see Further Guidelines.

For Staff, Postgraduate Research Students and Higher Risk Undergraduate or Taught Postgraduate Applications

These should be submitted online to C-REC by the Principal Investigator or Supervisor on behalf of the student. Students should discuss their application fully with their Supervisor before submission. On submission, a copy of the application is automatically sent to the Supervisor for electronic authorisation, after which the application is sent on to C-REC for review.

The Social Sciencees, Arts and Humanities C-REC works on a monthly reviewing cycle. Applications should be submitted by the 20th of each month for consideration by the 20th of the following month.

Queries should be directed to ESW's C-REC members, ie:
Dr Elaine Sharland: E.Sharland@sussex.ac.uk
Dr Janet Boddy: J.M.Boddy@sussex.ac.uk

For Undergraduate or Taught Postgraduate Low Risk Applications

These should be submitted online for official Supervisor approval and also that of the School Research Ethics Officer (SREO). Students should discuss their application fully with their Supervisor before submission. On submission, a copy of the application is automatically sent to the Supervisor for electronic authorisation, after which the application is sent on to the SREO for review and/or approval of the Supervisor's authorisation.

Queries should be directed to ESW's SREO, Vanessa Regan: V.Reegan@sussex.ac.uk

 

Information and resources

Full information about the University Research Governance Framework, including Standard Operating Procedures, guidance, templates (eg. consent forms and information sheets) and application forms can be found on the Research Governance website. University policies relating to Research Governance can be found on the Research Policies web page. These include guidance on intellectual property, external consultancy and codes of practice.

Information, guidance and resources with particular relevance to staff and students working within the School of Education and Social Work are as follows:

The ESRC has produced a very helpful, user-friendly, web-based resource: The Research Ethics Guidebook. It is designed for social science researchers at all stages of their training and careers. Its aim is to help you think your way through ethical issues at each stage of your research, and find your way through the variety of regulatory processes and procedures that can apply to social science research. It also signposts you to more detailed information along the way.

 

Examples of successful applications for research ethics approval

The following are examples of good practice in completing research ethics review forms - all were approved. They include examples of low and higher risk applications, as well as an 'exceptional case' for low risk review.
These examples have been anonymised and are offered here with the researchers' permission.
NOTE: Some of these applications utilise ethics review forms introduced in 2010 which are no longer in circulation.

 

Staff and student development activities

Staff and student development activities focused on research ethics and governance - and supporting the Standards and Guidelines - will be provided by the School, the Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities cross-University group, and the University.

Some useful resources from previous School workshops have been made available to download here:

Autumn 2004            Issues in Establishing Consent in Research
  Staff Development Workshop (Nov 04) [DOC 22.50KB]
  Informed Consent in Social Research [PDF 182.46KB]
   
Spring 2005 Assessing the Risks & Benefits of Research
  Staff Development Workshop (Feb 05) [DOC 22.50KB]
  Guidelines for Research Team Safety [DOC 31.00KB]
   
Summer 2005 Power Relations in Research
  Staff Development Workshop (June 05) [DOC 25.50KB]
   
Autumn 2005 Meeting Legal Requirements
  Cautionary Tales From the Law: Vogler [PPT 2.49MB]
   
Spring 2006 Addressing Research Ethics in "Developing" Countries
  Notes from Research Ethics Workshop (Feb 06) [DOC 63.00KB]
   
Summer 2006 Co-Writing & Ethics
   
Autumn 2006 Addressing Research Ethics in Teaching
   
Spring 2007 Ethical Issues in Material Archiving
  ESRC Approach to Research Ethics: Struthers [PPT 581.00KB]
  Ethics and Archives: Dunning [PPT 175.00KB]
   
Summer 2007 Ethics of Literature-Based Research
  Ethical Issues in Literature and Document-Based Research: Jolly [DOC 23.00KB]
  Ethics of Literature Reviewing: Sharland [PPT 544.00KB]
   
Autumn 2007 Addressing Ethical Concerns in Research Proposals
  Ethics and Research Governance Overview: Dowsett [PPT 218.50KB]
   
Spring 2008 Ethical Issues in Insider Research
  Ethics of Insider Research issues: Griffiths [DOC 31.50KB]
   
Summer 2008 Intellectual Property and Research Ethics
  Intellectual Property: Nicholls [PPT 493.00KB]
  Intellectual Property and Working With Archives: Dunn [PPT 247.50KB]
   
Autumn 2008 Research Misconduct
  Workshop - Research Misconduct: Martin [DOC 22.00KB]