Critical Theory Research Cluster

The Critical Theory Research Cluster brings together scholars working in the areas of critical theory, law and society, gender studies and more from within the School of Law, Politics and Sociology and the wider Sussex community of critical scholars.

CfP: After Rights? Politics, Ethics, Aesthetics 

Deadline for Abstract Submission: 30th June 2021

For further details see below

After Right? Politics, Ethics, Aesthetics

After Rights?

Politics, Ethics, Aesthetics

Call for Papers for a project and workshop series leading to a peer-reviewed journal special issue

Deadline for Abstract Submission: 30 June 2021 

Societies and publics in diverse political spaces are today confronted with social and political milieus that are ‘intentionally devoid of everything that a person needs to live’ (Bradley, 2019: 137). Such ‘hostile environments’ form spaces of abandonment, debility and rightlessness, the result of the confluence of ongoing colonial legacies and neoliberal capitalism (El-Enany 2020). We are thus witnessing the coexistence of effective rightlessness, disposability and socio-economic abandonment alongside human rights abundance and expansion (Gundogdu, 2015). These differently manifesting socio-economic and political landscapes, buttressed by the rise of right-wing populism and regressive political formations, have fuelled the concerns of resistance movements and critical rights scholars about the limits and boundaries of struggling through rights. Such concerns include, but are not limited to, consideration of the limitations of rights and indeed of their prospective complicity in producing processes of abandonment, precarity and debility that create effectively rightless subjects (Brown 2004; Sokhi-Bulley 2016; Tronto, 2012). To date, scholarship and social justice activism have questioned the reliance of human rights on restrictive, racialized notions of humanity, rationality and purposive agency, asking whether rights reverberate – historically and philosophically – with the racial and extractive legacies of empire (Gilroy 2019; Tascon and Ife 2008), thereby reinforcing colonial and settler colonial politics of recognition (Coulthard 2014). Questions abound, moreover, about how and whether human rights work, whether rights are enough and whether rights are at an endtimes (Sikkink, 2017; Moyn 2018; Hopgood 2013). Whether, and in what ways, rights function as technologies of governing and managing populations (Sokhi-Bulley 2016; Golder 2015; Kapur 2018), sometimes in conjunction with other assemblages such as ‘debility’ (Puar 2017) or ‘crisis’ (Bhambra 2017). Whether still, contrary to many 20th century expectations, rights may not be the antidote to rightlessness (Odysseos 2015) and may indeed signal the end of imagination (Douzinas 2000) or its curtailment within a ‘neoliberal fishbowl’ (Kapur, 2016). And, whether struggling (through) rights encloses struggles for transformational change within a politics of optimism that secures not only the material and exclusionary status quo but also its pervasive anti-blackness (Warren 2018).

These conjunctures prompt the central questions of this project:

  • Can we, and should we, imagine an ‘after rights’?
  • What comes ‘after rights’?
  • What are the political, ethical and aesthetic/poetic implications of thinking ‘after rights’? 

The project and envisioned journal Special Issue invite submissions by critical rights scholars in diverse career stages and disciplinary locations, as well as from a range of theoretical and ethico-political sensibilities. We aim to jointly interrogate both the failings in the promises of liberal conceptions of rights arising from the wide-ranging critiques mentioned above, and also co-produce work with struggles and social formations striving for alternative futures, 

including radical reimaginations of human rights. We encourage submissions that entwine the analyses of disposability, abandonment and effective rightlessness; that reflect on the polysemic meanings of the after in ‘after rights?’, where ‘after’ takes on a range of meanings as a move beyond, a radical reimagining, and a space of practice and possibility to remake rights otherwise. We want to encourage re-conceptualisations of critique beyond philosophical intervention, as entailing questioning of political engagement, ethical comportment, social poesis, as well as spirituality (Hartman 2019; Foucault, 2001; Hadot, 1995). We envision, in other words, that proposed papers will aim to stretch the political, ethical, aesthetic / poetic imagination of what plural futures of rights might look like. We invite both theoretical and practice- and/or case-study based contributions offering radical reflections on what ‘after rights’ might come to mean in philosophical and praxeological terms. The papers are thus intended to form a collection of radical interventions that respond to our times and may address wide-ranging issues, such as climate change, Israeli apartheid and the Palestinian calls for freedom, indigenous politics and resurgence, the Farmers Protests in India, the UK’s hostile environment (including issues of deprivation of citizenship, deportation and expulsion), Covid-19 and racial capitalism, as well as Fourth World struggles for material and structural change, amongst others. 

Much critical thinking in these directions is currently ongoing and is vital to shaping our understanding of both reimaginations of human rights and reflections on the meaning and possibilities of the ‘after’ outside of juridico-liberal frameworks. Such work has focused rethinking rights in alternative terms, through divergent temporal horizons, exploring enhanced poetic and relational possibilities; resistive practices of self-formation and performativity that would reimagine human rights away from the political and ethical frameworks of a market society (Bhambra 2017; Coulthard 2014; El-Enany, 2020; Gilroy 2019; Golder 2015; Hadot 1995; Haraway 2016; Hopgood 2013; Kapur 2018; Lefebvre 2018; Madhok 2017; McNeilly 2016; Mignolo 2014; Moyn 2018; Odysseos 2015; Puar 2017; Sikkink 2017; Sokhi-Bulley 2016; Tascón and Ife 2008; Tronto 2012; Whyte 2019; Zivi 2012).

Extending and critically interrogating ongoing work, as well as forging new directions, we encourage contributions engaging with, but not limited to, the following questions:

  • In what ways and with what resources do we imagine possibilities of ‘after rights’?
  • What political, ethical, aesthetic / poetic imaginations could inform what plural futures of rights might look like?
  • What might ‘after rights’ come to mean in philosophical and praxeological terms?
  • Does thinking of ‘after rights’ require of us to unlearn existing forms of praxis and struggle with, over and beyond rights?
  • In what ways does questioning what comes ‘after rights’ refer to alternative forms of political engagement, ethical comportment, social poesis, as well as spirituality?
  • How can we radically reimagine other futures, languages, meanings and praxes of rights in order to respond to the legacies and present conditions of disposability and rightlessness?

Our own motivation as convenors of this project and guest editors / curators of the resulting Special Issue derives from dissatisfaction in writing and teaching within and against the confines of liberal rights frameworks, and a desire and ‘response-ability’ (Haraway 2016: 3) to stay with the challenge posed by the possibilities of ‘after rights’. 

This project involves a series of workshops leading to a journal special issue. The workshops will be the main form of engagement amongst project participants and will also serve the purpose of providing authors with concerted feedback on individual work, as well as ensuring that the overall project is cohesive. Possible target journals for the Special Issue are, inter alia, International Journal of Human RightsHumanity JournalTheory, Culture and SocietyJournal of Human RightsInterventions: Journal of Postcolonial Studies.

Project Convenors and Guest-Editors

Prof. Louiza Odysseos, School of Global Studies, University of Sussex,

Dr. Bal Sokhi-Bulley, School of Law, Politics & Sociology, University of Sussex, 


30 June 2021: Deadline for submission of abstracts. Abstracts, including a working title, should be 250-300 words and be emailed to both editors. Successful contributions will be notified in July 2021. 

15 October 2021: Draft papers due. Authors will be invited to present their draft papers in a rolling series of online workshops between October 2021-February 2022. The workshops will be jointly hosted by the Sussex Rights and Justice Centre and Sussex Critical Theory Research Cluster. 

End-March 2022: Final, revised papers due. 

Please do get in touch if you are interested in the project but would discuss deadlines or have any other queries.


Bhambra, Gurminder K. 2017. The current crisis of Europe: refugees, colonialism, and the limits of cosmopolitanism. European Law Journal 23(5), 395-405. 

Brown, Wendy. 2004. ‘"The Most We Can Hope For. . . ": Human Rights and the Politics of Fatalism’. The South Atlantic Quarterly 103(2/3), 451–463.

Coulthard, Glen Sean. 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 

El-Enany, Nadine. 2019. (B)ordering Britain: Law, Race and Empire. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 

Gilroy, Paul. 2019. ‘Never Again: Refusing Race and Salvaging the Human’. New Frame, 20 June.

Golder, Ben. 2015. Foucault and the Politics of Rights. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 

Hadot, Pierre. 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life. Oxford: Blackwell. 

Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the TroubleMaking Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press. 

Hopgood, Stephen. 2013. The Endtimes of Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Kapur, Ratna. 2018. Gender, Alterity and Human Rights: Freedom in a Fishbowl. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lefebvre, Alexandre. 2018. Human Rights and the Care of the Self. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Madhok, Sumi. 2017. On Vernacular Rights Cultures and the Political Imaginaries of Haq. Humanity 8(3), 485-509.

McNeilly, Kathryn. 2016. After the Critique of Rights: For a Radical Democratic Theory and Practice of Human Rights. Law and Critique 7(3), 269-288.

Mignolo, Walter. 2014. From ‘human rights’ to ‘life rights’. In The Meanings of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights, eds. Costas Douzinas and Conor Gearty, 161-180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moyn, Samuel. 2018. Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Odysseos, Louiza. 2015. The Question Concerning Human Rights and Human Rightlessness: Disposability and Struggle in the Bhopal Gas Disaster. Third World Quarterly 36(6) 1041–59.

Puar, Jasbir K. 2017. The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Durham: Duke University Press.

Sikkink, Kathryn. 2017. Evidence for Hope: Making Human Rights Work in the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sokhi-Bulley, Bal. 2016. Governing (Through) Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Tascón, Sonia and Jim Ife. 2008. Human Rights and Critical Whiteness: Whose Humanity? The International Journal of Human Rights 12(3), 307–327.

Tronto, Joan C. 2012. Partiality Based on Relational Responsibilities: Another Approach to Global Ethics. Ethics and Social Welfare 6(3), 303-316.

Warren, Calvin L. 2018. Ontological Terror: Blackness, Nihilism, and Emancipation. Durham: Duke University Press.

Whyte, Jessica. 2019. The Morals of the Market: Human Rights and the Rise of Neoliberalism. London: Verso.

Zivi, Karen. 2012. Making Rights Claims: A Practice of Democratic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Upcoming Events 

SPR 20/21 Events Programme

Welcome to the schedule of events for SPR 2021 

Critical Literacies 

This term the critical theory research cluster welcomes discussions on the tools we use in our work to respond to our troubled present by asking:  ‘What critical literacies are we trying to develop?’ 

Week 4


Date: Thursday 18 Feb 2021


Gurminder K Bhambra (Prof of Postcolonial & Decolonial Studies, IR, Sussex): 

Decolonizing Critical Theory? Epistemological Justice, Progress, Reparations 

Theorists working within the Frankfurt school tradition of critical theory have not been immune to calls to “decolonize” that have been circulating in and beyond the academic world. This article asks what it means to seek to decolonize a tradition of thought that has never explicitly acknowledged colonial histories. What is needed, instead, this article suggests, is consideration of the very implications of the “colonial modern”—that is, an acknowledgement of the colonial constitution of modernity—for Frankfurt school critical theory’s idea of historical progress. The issue is more extensive than simply acknowledging the substantive neglect of colonialism within the tradition; rather, this article suggests that its categories of critique and their associated normative claims are also necessarily implicated by this neglect and require transformation. Acknowledgment of colonial histories requires material reparations for the substantive inequalities bequeathed as legacies of the past, but these reparations also require a transformation of understandings and a recognition of “epistemological justice.” 

Week 6


Date: Thursday 4 March 2021

Time: 12.30-2pm

 Viktoria Huegel (University of Brighton) 

On the notion of authority and new authoritarianism  

In the first part of this presentation, I introduce the question and the context that is guiding my PhD research: What is the role of authority in democratic thought? We recently have observed a rise of new authoritarianism(s): practices that undermine democratic institutions in the name of “the people”. However, at which turn does authority turn authoritarian? I argue that by confusing all forms of state intervention as equally violent and destructive, we disregard the fact that the withdrawal from authority might be just as harmful as its abuse. I further take this as an opportunity – following the theme of critical literacies as well as authority – to reflect on my appropriation of Carl Schmitt for this project.

Lucy Finchett-Maddock (Senior Lecturer, SLS)

Creativity in/of the Void: Harnessing Law's Dependence and Destruction

This piece discusses the way addiction is formulated by the practices and tactics of law, to say that law itself is addiction, and addiction is law. Combining desire and destruction through the work of Gilles Deleuze, Kathryn Yusoff and Catherine Malabou, both addiction and law are explored as cumulative processes of material and immaterial yearning emanating from and within thermodynamic movements of order/disorder, destruction/creation and the tightrope of equilibrium known better as entropy, within and outside, human and other bodies. The entropic speed of addiction is described in terms of its capacity to resonate, to compel, impel and repel: it is magnetic, and so too is law. Addiction is described as rule-making, through the funnelling of attention to sediment layers of law as habit, routine and custom through repetition, leading to the ultimate expression of law, that of subjectivity and the crystallisation of form - the institutionalisation of property and the overcoming of uncertainty through control. Addiction is argued as the very extremity, the ultimate meaning, the very motor of legal morphology itself; the striving of life against death, a speculative genesis and the baroque pathways carved in the process.

Week 6


Date: Friday 05 March 2021

Time: 17:00 to 18:30 (GMT)

The event features a conversation between Nadya Ali (International Relations), Naaz Rashid (Media & Film) and Bal Sokhi-Bulley (Law) on the racialised logics of rights, citizenship and borders. 

Register via eventbrite here.

All welcome!


Week 8


Date: Thursday 18 March 2021

Time: 12.30-2pm

Joint session with Centre for Colonial and Postcolonial Studies, and Sussex Rights and Justice Research Centre 

Louiza Odysseos (Prof of International Relations, Dpt of IR, Sussex): Critical Literacies of Injured and Injurable Flesh? Phenomenology, Regimes of Semiosis and the ‘Worlds’ of Neoliberal and Colonial Disposability 

What insights does injured and injurable flesh disclose? And, what critical literacies does attention to the disclosures of the flesh help us develop regarding the interconnections between contemporary and colonial forms of disposability? In asking these questions, this paper calls for a concerted interrogation of the neglected capacities of the flesh to disclose the terrains or ‘worlds’ of dispossession, disposability and harm in which such flesh is ‘thrown’. It turns to the phenomenology of illness and bodily suffering in order to discuss the radically phenomenological operations of ‘bodies in pain’.

The plural approaches within the phenomenology of illness reveal the discursive circumscription of injured and injurable flesh by pathology and a wider imaginary of damage in the discourses and practices of the medical sciences and in histories of medical practice. More broadly, they reveal the ways in which flesh comes to be endowed with historically specific and evolving meanings — captured as racialised, gendered, de/valued bodies — within economies of signs and systems of signification.

On the basis of this wider insight, the paper turns to the work of Hortense J. Spillers — and her insistence on the distinction between body and flesh — in order to explore the ways in which flesh illuminates the operation of systems of signification through which the assignment of value occurred in the long centuries of the circum-Atlantic slave trade and plantation slavery, enabling the naturalisation of colonial subjugation and racial enslavement. Moreover, the paper discusses the ‘transmissibility’ of these economies of signs, the radical dis/continuity of their grammar in the present.

It ends with a discussion of how the lived capaciousness of the flesh may enable new semiotic production that undercuts ongoing colonial regimes of semiosis.  

Darcy Leigh (Lecturer in Law, LPS): Free speech as settler colonialism: An ongoing history of dehumanization, assimilation and stratification 

Far right activists, mainstream media and conservative politicians have declared a ‘free speech crisis’ across the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Public and scholarly debates surrounding free speech often assume free speech is a public good and/or should be approached as a problem of ‘drawing the line’ between free and regulated or benign and harmful speech.

In contrast, this article takes an historical approach, arguing that free speech has, since its inception, been integral to white supremacist settler colonialism in the Anglosphere. First, by establishing oppositions between white ‘civilized’ liberal statehood and its Indigenized racially figured ‘others’. Second, by excluding, assimilating and/or stratifying Indigenous and racially othered speech, as part of settler occupation, slavery and assimilation.

The article focusses on two points in the history of free speech: free speech as ‘toleration’ in the early European Enlightenment; and the ‘marketplace of ideas’ in the 1800s.To demonstrate its significance today, the article also examines how this history informs free speech in contemporary universities. 

Week 10


Date: Thursday 22 April 2021

Time: 12.30-2pm

Darrow Schecter, Critical Theory and Sociological Theory: On Late Modernity and Social Statehood, (MUP, 2019) (Prof Critical Theory and Modern European History, School of Media, Arts & Humanities, Sussex). 

Discussant: Tarik Kochi (Senior Lecturer, SLS) 

Democracy in the twenty-first century faces numerous challenges, with populism, neoliberalism, and globalisation being three of the most pressing. Critical theory and sociological theory explores and addresses these challenges by investigating how the conditions of democratic statehood have been altered at key intervals since 1945. At a time when mediations between citizens and statehood are rapidly changing, it argues that a sociological approach is urgently needed to address conceptual deficits and explain how the formal mechanisms of democratic statehood can be complemented and updated.

All welcome!

Zoom links to the sessions will be emailed to Cluster Members and LPS staff. 

Email: if you require a link!  

AUT 20/21 Events Programme

Critical Theory Research Cluster AUT 20-21 Events

Critical Theory in Times of Pandemic

This Autumn, the critical theory research cluster will address thinking and writing in times of pandemic. We are holding three (WiP) workshops and one ‘conversation with the author’ event (Week 8) with contributions from a range of disciplines in both Sussex and Brighton. We invite you to interrogate with us: Why is critical theory important? What transformative practices are enabled? And, who is the public for critical theory? 

All events will take place via Zoom – details to be emailed out to LPS staff + Cluster members (email: to be placed on the cluster mailing list), apart from Week 8, which will be a blended session. 

Please share widely, all welcome 

Week 4, Thursday 22 October, 2-3.30pm: PANDEMIC, RACE AND CLASS 

Ben Rogaly (Prof of Human Geography, Geography, Sussex),‘Working Class Unity’ 

Bal Sokhi-Bulley (Senior Lecturer in Law & Critical Theory, LPS) ‘From Exotic to “Dirty”: Pandemic and Recolonisation' 

In this session, the speakers will be in conversation on making calls for ‘unity’ in times of pandemic and protest. They will be speaking to ‘friendship’ and ‘place’ as conceptual and practical tools that enable a response to abandonment, looking at the contexts of local lockdowns (Leicester) and the recent politics of a multi-racial leave-voting city (Peterborough). 

We welcome Ben Rogaly, Professor of Human Geography and author of Stories from a Migrant City (MUP 2020) 

Week 6, Thursday 5 Nov, 2.00-3.30pm: CRITIQUE AND POSTHUMANISM 

Sabrina Gilani, 'What Comes First, the Theory or the Question?' Researching Criminal Law and the Posthuman (Lecturer in Canadian Law, Law, LPS) ... This is a reflection more than a presentation on my research in the area of Criminal Law and the Posthuman.  Through this reflection I think back to the question of what drives critical legal scholarship, the theory or the problem, and invite others to share their own experiences in publishing critical research.

Paul McGuinness 'Robocop (1987) as technosceance: cyborg hauntologies and The Future of Law Enforcement' (Lecturer in Criminology and Sociology, Sociology, LPS) ...Using an ontology of fiction and a cinematically hauntological methodology I position Paul Verhoeven’s Robocop (1987) as a form of ‘technosceance’, by engaging audiences in policing’s technological uncanny, the ghost in an increasingly solutionist machine. By reading Verhoeven’s text with Mark Fisher and Andrew Feenberg, I reclaim Robocop from its reactionary afterlife and rearticulate its subversive dramatization of the dialectical necessities of policing and technology.


Week 8: Thursday 19 Nov, 2-3.30: CRITIQUE AND GLOBAL JUSTICE Book Launch 

Tarik Kochi, Global Justice and Social Conflict: The Foundations of Liberal Order and International Law (Routledge, 2019) (Senior Lecturer in Law, LPS) 

Chair: Bal Sokhi-Bulley (Senior Lecturer in Law & Critical Theory, LPS) 

What is Global Justice? How might critical theory today address the problem of a global justice? In this session, Tarik will speak to these questions by introducing his recently published book Global Justice and Social Conflict. We encourage you to respond during the discussion that will follow.

Online Event: Join via Zoom


Week 10: Thursday 3 Dec, 2-3.30pm: POLICE AND AFFECT, POLICING AFFECT? 

Melayna Lamb (Tutor in Criminology, LPS), 'Policing the Pandemic'

ABSTRACT: This paper examines the effects of policing public health emergencies as a matter of public order. During the summer, against the background of a global pandemic, we saw an explosion of Black Lives Matter protests occurring in both the US and UK in the wake of the killing of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. Rather than thinking through these issues separately, this paper will analyse the relation between them. I will explore the intimate relationship between ‘public health’ and ‘public order’, arguing that understanding them together allows us to understand ways in which states may intensify their interventions and expand their power with little regard for democratic accountability. What connects them is the question of ‘the public’. With public order the spectre of the ‘disorderly’ is presented as a problem that must be contained and policed against. In public health, disease, ill-health and contagion are also staged as something that needs to be ‘fought’. The thesis here is that disorder and disease have been historically linked not only in terms of who is considered a threat to the order and health of the state, but also that the state performs its assumed necessity for social life by ‘fighting’ disorder and disease. That black people are more likely to die as a result of Covid-19 and are more likely to be the targets of police harassment and violence necessitates an approach that not only shows the link between the two, but asks in whose name the state acts when it claims the ‘public’ as its own.

Swastee Ranjan (PhD Candidate in Law, LPS), 'Law and Affective Aesthetics of Environment'

ABSTRACT: This paper emerges from my ongoing PhD thesis which discusses the relationship between objects found on the surface of the city such as streetlights, and law. While legal theory has discussed the role of object, rarely has it depended on the excavation of such physical objects to explore dimensions of law. Objects such as the streetlights appear in the regulatory assemblages of the city, but they are represented as inert, passive, recipients of formal laws. In my work, I challenge this representation of objects, to argue that not only are they dynamic and vital elements of the urban environment, but they are also sources of law. Drawing on the new materialist and speculative realist philosophies, I argue that law is affective since it both directs the movements of bodies and is also, shaped by them. In the present paper, I share an account of walking in Delhi at midnight to illustrate how these objects constitute law and alter perceptions of urban environment, which appears as more vibrant, than a mere background, condition for urban existence. I discuss how such an account can help in extending the dimensions of environmental law and contribute to its varied understanding. 

Previous Events

Our exciting SPR 19/20 programme on 'What is Critique Today' was postponed due to Coronavirus. See our current AUT 20/21 events for a revised programme on 'Critique in Times on Pandemic'.  

In December 2018, the Cluster hosted Professor Elden for a lecture on 'Foucault before the History of Madness: lectures, translations, Nietzsche' 

 A recording of the talk is available here

This lecture reports on a project tracing the intellectual history of the early Foucault. It focuses on his largely unknown work in the 1950s. In particular it discusses three themes. First, Foucault’s early teaching in Lille at the École Normale Supérieure in Paris. Three main courses are preserved – on ‘Phenomenology and Binswanger’, ‘Knowledge of Man and Transcendental Reflection’ and ‘Phenomenology and Psychology’. These link in important ways to work Foucault would go on to publish, but also outline paths not pursued. Second his role as a co-translator of two texts – Ludwig Binswanger’s ‘Traum und Existenz’ and Viktor von Weizsäcker’s Der Gestaltkreis. His role is bringing these Swiss and German works into French is underappreciated. The introduction to Binswanger is quite well known, but his role in the translation itself – which was credited to Jacqueline Verdeaux alone – is underexplored. His co-translation of von Weizsâcker, with Daniel Rocher, is sometimes referenced but underexamined. There is an important, and disturbing, political context to this work. Finally the lecture will discuss Foucault’s reading of Friedrich Nietzsche in the 1950s, questioning some of the accepted chronologies and interpretations.

Stuart Elden is Professor of Political Theory and Geography at the University of Warwick, UK. He is the author of books on territory, Michel Foucault, Martin Heidegger, and Henri Lefebvre. His most recent book is Shakespearea Territories (University of Chicago Press, 2018).

 Stuart Elden Lecture Poster


Stuart Elden’s The Birth of Power (Polity Press, 2017)

Stuart Elden Book cover

The Birth of Power meticulously traces what Elden calls Foucault's 'political awakening' - as a writer, researcher, lecturer, and activist - in the period between the Archaeology of Knowledge and Discipline and Punish and serves as a prequel to Elden's work, Foucault's Last Decade. In this group we consider what it means to think of Foucault as a political writer, researcher, lecturer and activist; what constitutes this ‘political awakening’; and what Elden’s ‘genealogy’ of Foucault’s thought between AoK and D&P might add to thinking in, on and with Foucault.
 The Cluster hosted Professor Elden for a stimulating discussion on these themes and the process of writing.


Co-Directors: Tarik Kochi and Bal Sokhi-Bulley

Critical Theory Research Cluster Members

David Berry

Kimberley Brayson

Amy Clarke

Jane Cowan

Thomas Ebbs

Sabrina Gilani

Tarik Kochi

Melayna Lamb

Darcy Leigh

Paul McGuinness

Chistina Miliou

Jack O'Connor

Louiza Odysseos

Moss A.G. Ramberg

Swastee Ranjan

Jake Rubin

Caio Rubini

Bal Sokhi-Bulley

Darrow Schecter

Kathryn Telling

Dean Wilson

Elle Whitcroft