Broadcast: News items
Rise in urban beekeeping may have gone too far, scientists warn
Posted on behalf of: Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects
Last updated: Monday, 12 August 2013

Urban beekeeping is growing in popularity - but is it good for the bees?

Bumblebees on globe thistle
University of Sussex scientists are urging people in towns and cities who are keen to help the honey bee not to buy a hive but to grow bee-friendly flowers instead.
The advice comes in an article in The Biologist by Professor Francis Ratnieks and Dr Karin Alton from the Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects (LASI).
Spurred on by widespread coverage of declining bee numbers, urban beekeeping has never been more popular, particularly in London, but the boom could be bad for honey bees and other flower-visiting insects as it risks overtaxing the available nectar and pollen supply, and potentially encourages the spread of diseases.
Professor Ratnieks says: “Both honey bees and wild bees have been declining. Although the causes are complex the most important one seems to be loss of flowers and habitat.
“Since World War Two the spread of intensive farming has greatly reduced areas rich in wildflowers, such as hay meadows. In the UK, 75 per cent of the total land is now agricultural, so the lack of flowers is a major problem for our bees.
With the number of urban hives on the increase, there needs to be sufficient food. Although urban areas have gardens, parks and other green areas, they also have a high proportion of buildings, roads and other non-green areas. Even the green areas often have very few flowers.
Professor Ratnieks says: “If the problem is not enough flowers, increasing the number of hives risks making that problem worse. The honey bee is just one of many insect species which feed on nectar and pollen. Having a high density of honey bee hives is not only bad for honey bees, but may also affect bumblebees and other species feeding on the same flowers.
“If a game park was short of food for elephants, you wouldn’t introduce more elephants, so why should we take this approach with bees?”
High colony density in London and an influx of inexperienced beekeepers also runs the risk of spreading certain honey bee diseases, especially American foulbrood (AFB), a rare but highly contagious bacterial infection of honey bee larvae. The “cure” for AFB, which has very long-lived spores that contaminate the wax combs, is to burn the hive.
Co-author Dr Karin Alton says: “Our calculations indicate that each new hive placed in London would need the equivalent of one hectare of borage, a plant that attracts mainly honey bees, or 8.3 hectares of lavender, a plant that attracts mainly bumblebees but some honey bees.
“The honey bee may have declined but is in no imminent danger of extinction, unlike some other critically endangered insects in the UK. There are better ways to help our declining honeybee population than encouraging beekeeping to the point of overstocking certain areas.
“Rather than encouraging more hives, a better alternative would be to translate the concern that people have for bees by providing more flowers and habitat.”
Professor Ratnieks adds: “It’s great that the public are concerned for bees and want to help. But this enthusiasm needs to be better channelled.
“We would not want to discourage anyone from taking up beekeeping if that is what they want to do. Beekeeping can be a fascinating hobby, but should not be seen as a way of helping bees when done in areas such as London, where honey bees are already very abundant.”