IT Services

Freedom of Information

This page contains Freedom of Information requests recently received by IT Services and the responses given.

In relation to the use of application software in your organisation I would like to know the name of the vendor and application for a. Finance General Ledger; b. Planning/Budgeting; c. Human Resources; d. Performance Management; e. Corporate Business Intelligence reporting [2444]

  1. BluQube Financials with in-house developments; Begin replaced with Agresso Business World.
  2. Planner in ABW and Excel.
    • HR – part of a solution developed for HE sector in late 1990s by Oracle for the MAC family (part of funding council sponsored initiative).
    • Pay – Altar / HR from University of Birmingham.
    • both to be replaced with solution recently selected (unable to announce at this time - commercial in confidence).
  3. None.
  4. Impromptu / Cognos.

2444 (last updated 1 February 2012)

If the University has entered into Shared Services, or IT outsourcing with another body can you please let me know the name of that organisation? [2445]

The only shared service is provided by JANET(UK) – provision of main external network service.

2445 (last updated 1 February 2012)

Over the last 3 years has your institution suffered any prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs as a result of the publication of e-mail addresses on your website? [2446]

Not to the best of our knowledge, and no relevant information is held.

2446 (last updated 1 February 2012)

Please describe your present IT management and project management processes in relation to approaches, methodologies and industry best practice used? [2447]

Major projects are managed following a gateway process operated in the public sector. The process is described in:

sussex.ac.uk/efm/documents/sussex-project-management-framework.doc

2447 (last updated 1 February 2012)

Please describe your institution's IT decision making/governance structures and process(es) for infrastructure investment and development? [2448]

IT Services is managed by the Director of IT Services who reports to the University's Registrar and Secretary.  IT governance and major investments are handled through the work of the Information Services Committee and Capital Programme Committee. The responsibilities of Information Services Committee are set out on page 22 of:

sussex.ac.uk/governance/documents/OrganisationoftheUniversity2011-12.pdf

and the responsibilities of Capital Programme Committee on page 23 of the same document.

2448 (last updated 21 February 2012)

Please describe how your institution keeps track of IT projects and resources consumed after they have been approved? [2449]

Through programme boards established as a part of the gateway process outlined in question 2447.

2449 (last updated 1 February 2012)

Does your institution have an office of Chief Information Officer (CIO) or IT governance? If so what are their main responsibilities? Can you summarise your IT governance principles, processes? [2450]

The University has a Director of Information Technology Services. The Director's principle duties are Head of the Information Technology Services Department and Chief strategy advisor for the exploitation of Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) within the University.  For details about the IT Services Department see:

sussex.ac.uk/its/about

For details of IT Governance see the response to question 2448.

2450 (last updated 21 February 2012)

Does your institution have a document or series of documents that can be clearly referred to as the IT Strategic plan, and if so, could this or a summary of the key principles of it be provided? [2451]

The IT strategic plan can be found at:

sussex.ac.uk/its/about/strategy

2451 (last updated 1 February 2012)

What is the title for the most senior IT leadership role at your institution and are they part of the corporate or senior/executive management team? [2452]

See response to question 2450. The Director of IT Services is a senior manager in the University.

2452 (last updated 1 February 2012)

Does your institution make use of a central project approval and enforcement authority/department with capability to stop under-performing IT projects? If not what do you have instead? [2453]

Yes, through gateway reviews described in:

sussex.ac.uk/efm/documents/sussex-project-management-framework.doc

2453 (last updated 1 February 2012)

Does your institution currently use an Enterprise Architecture approach, best practice standard(s), framework, or methodology in meeting business objectives with IT? If not, please state whether senior IT or business management staff have discussed or considered an Enterprise Architecture approach in the past? [2454]

We do not formally use this approach. Senior business and IT staff have discussed the approach to providing major business systems.

2454 (last updated 1 February 2012)

Name of the person/s in your organisation responsible for the maintenance support contracts. [2459]

Maintenance support arrangements are the responsibility of management of the University’s IT Services Department.  The current holders of these posts can be found on the web site (http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/about)

2459 (last updated 17 February 2012)

A breakdown of the University's hardware maintenance and costs: A list of the models of the physical servers, storage devices, tape libraries, network switches and routers under support contracts; as well as the cost and duration of said contracts, with start and end dates and service level associated with the equipment. Please also supply the names of the suppliers of aforementioned support services [2461]

The University purchases its server systems under the National Servers and Storage framework agreement.   Almost all of the servers are purchased directly from Dell with four or five years’ support (either next day support or 4 hour support) included in the purchase price.  We purchase mostly mid-range models currently R410 and R510 systems.  Servers are bought when required by the business and so the end dates for support are four or five years following the purchase date.  We have a small number of Apple Xserve systems which were also purchased with five year support from Apple.  We have a few legacy SUN systems also purchased from the National framework; some of these are supported by Oracle directly and others are no longer maintained.  Oracle’s standard support arrangement is a four hour response.

 

We use the Falcon storage SAN systems with Dell servers as controllers and DotHill storage systems; these are again bought with four or five year support.  We also have some DAS which is supplied by Dell.  Again these purchases are made under the National framework agreement.  The storage support is a four hour response time contract.

 

Our tape libraries were purchased from Sun and are presently maintained under a maintenance agreement with Oracle.

 

The majority of our wired network is HP ProCurve equipment; the edge devices come with a life-time warranty and the aggregation layer and core devices are purchased with four or five years’ warranty from HP via a supplier selected from the JANET framework agreement.  We also have a small amount of Cisco equipment which was purchased with a maintenance and support contract through the JANET framework agreement.

 

We tend to include the support agreements covering the expected life-time of equipment at the time we purchase the equipment.  This reduces our administrative costs and is generally better value for money.

 

Where we have maintenance contracts for equipment which has not been included with the purchase of the equipment, or if we run equipment beyond its planned life-time and wish to have it maintained, we align these to the University’s financial year whenever possible and continue to use the manufacturer’s support offerings.

 

We regard any further details of our support arrangements as commercial in confidence.

2461 (last updated 21 February 2012)

If articulated and documented, what are your IT governance principles for prioritising and approving new infrastructure investments or project proposals? [2473]

At present all major IT projects are progressed via the project gateway process (see FAQ 2453).  The University's Capital Programme Committee reviews projects and decides which projects proceed.  The Director of IT Services is a member of this committee.  Smaller "projects" are progressed internally within IT Services, and the decision to make such rests with the Director of IT Services and his senior colleagues.  All such projects are reported to the University's Information Services Committee.  The committee structure can be viewed at: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/governance/documents/OrganisationoftheUniversity2011-12.pdf

2473 (last updated 12 March 2012)

Does the Director of Information technology Services sit on the University's executive management team? [2474]

The University's Director of IT Services is a member of the Professional Service Group - a committee chaired by the Registrar and Secretary made up of the heads of all the professional service groups and the Librarian.  The Director of IT Services is not a member of the Vice-Chancellor's Executive Group - the Registrar and Secretary represents the interests of all of the professional services on that body.

2474 (last updated 13 March 2012)

What software do we have which can detect plagiarism? How often has it has been applied? What is the pricing structure? [2476]

Turnitin® software is NOT used within the University of Sussex to detect plagiarism but as a formative tool for students to develop their academic skills.

It is made available to all students to use as part of their development of academic skills. So we are using it currently to *prevent* academic misconduct.

No cases of academic misconduct due to plagiarism will therefore have been uncovered or evidenced through the use of Turnitin®.

We only started using Turnitin® across the campus on 8th Nov 2010, so we don't have any full academic years.

From 8 Nov 2010 to mid-November 2011, 13097 files were uploaded to Turnitin® by UG/PG (T) students.

From mid-November 2011 to now (24 Feb 2012) 8752 files were uploaded to Turnitin® by UG/PG (T) students.

A site for doctoral students was launched in April 2011 and has been used to submit 248 files since then.

In terms of costs, the license costs are fixed by the size of the institution. 

We haven't purchased any additional hardware for the service. There is some expenditure of staff time for support, although this is pretty minimal and is managed within existing provision for Study Direct generally. 

2476 (last updated 13 March 2012)

Updated on 09 February 2012