eHALOPH - Halophytes Database

Publication Type	J
Authors	Liu, A; Hu, ZR; Bi, AY; Fan, JB; Gitau, MM; Amombo, E; Chen, L; Fu, JM
Author Full Name	Liu, Ao; Hu, Zhengrong; Bi, Aoyue; Fan, Jibiao; Gitau, Margaret Mukami; Amombo, Erick; Chen, Liang; Fu, Jinmin
Title	Photosynthesis, antioxidant system and gene expression of bermudagrass in response to low temperature and salt stress
Source	ECOTOXICOLOGY
Language	English
Document Type	Article
Author Keywords	Cynodon dactylon; Cold stress; Salt stress; Photosystem II; Antioxidant defense systems; Gene expression
Keywords Plus	PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS L; DACTYLON L. PERS.; SUPEROXIDE-DISMUTASE; COLD STRESS; SALINITY STRESS; PERENNIAL RYEGRASS; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; FREEZING-TOLERANCE; TRANSGENIC PLANTS; PHOTOSYSTEM-II
Abstract	There is widespread distribution of salinized lands in northern China. Harnessing such land is essential to environmental health. Bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] has the potential to improve the salinized lands. However, low temperature remarkably limits the growth of bermudagrass in winter. Currently, there is no information about the interaction of cold and salt in this plant. Hence, the objectives of this study were to figure out the effects of combined cold and salinity stress on bermudagrass. In this study, 4 A degrees C and 200 mM salt solution was used as cold and salt treatments respectively while 4 A degrees C along with 200 mM salt solution were applied as combined stress. After 5 days treatment, bermudagrass displayed a dramatic decline in the turf quality and chlorophyll content, but higher malonaldehyde, electrolyte leakage, hydrogen peroxide content, antioxidant enzyme activity in the combined stress regime as compared to cold or salt treated alone. Analysis of chlorophyll a revealed that the combined stress aggravated stress-induced inhibition of photosystem II. In addition, the expressions of stress-related genes were up-regulated with a lower expression level when cold and salt applied together. In summary, the grass exposed to combined stress presented a relatively lower stress tolerance and suffered a more severe damage than grass grown in the other regimes. These findings are crucial for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of cold and salt combined stress in bermudagrass, and provide information for breeding programs to select and develop bermudagrass cultivars that are suitable for improvement of the northern China salinized land.
Author Address	[Liu, Ao; Hu, Zhengrong; Bi, Aoyue; Fan, Jibiao; Gitau, Margaret Mukami; Amombo, Erick; Chen, Liang; Fu, Jinmin] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Plant Germplasm Enhancement & Specialty A, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China; [Liu, Ao; Hu, Zhengrong; Bi, Aoyue; Fan, Jibiao; Chen, Liang] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19 Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
Reprint Address	Chen, L; Fu, JM (reprint author), Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Plant Germplasm Enhancement & Specialty A, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China.; Chen, L (reprint author), Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19 Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
E-mail Address	Chenliang1034@126.com; jfu@wbgcas.cn
Funding Agency and Grant Number	China National Science Foundation (NSFC) [31401915, 31272194]; China-Africa Center for Research and Education [SAJC201325]; Hubei Province National Science Foundation Sciences [ZRY1326]; CAS Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture [Y452341X01]
Funding Text	This work was supported by the China National Science Foundation (NSFC) (Grant Nos. 31401915 and 31272194), China-Africa Center for Research and Education (Grant No. SAJC201325), the Hubei Province National Science Foundation Sciences (Grant No. ZRY1326) and the outstanding young talent program of CAS Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture (Grant No. Y452341X01).
Cited References	Alexieva V, 2001, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V24, P1337, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00778.x; Ashraf M, 2009, BIOTECHNOL ADV, V27, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.003; Babu RC, 2004, PLANT SCI, V166, P855, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.11.023; BRUGNOLI E, 1991, PLANT PHYSIOL, V95, P628, DOI 10.1104/pp.95.2.628; Canci H, 2009, J AGRON CROP SCI, V195, P47, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00345.x; CHANCE B, 1955, METHOD ENZYMOL, V2, P764, DOI 10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8; Chaves MM, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P551, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcn125; Chen K, 2014, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V122, P305, DOI 10.1007/s11120-014-0035-3; Chen K, 2013, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V116, P21, DOI 10.1007/s11120-013-9883-5; Chen L, 2015, BMC PLANT BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12870-015-0598-y; Chinnusamy V, 2005, CROP SCI, V45, P437; Chinnusamy V, 2007, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V12, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.07.002; Demetriou Georgia, 2007, Biochim Biophys Acta, V1767, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.02.020; DUNNING CA, 1994, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V92, P516; Ebdon JS, 2002, HORTSCIENCE, V37, P826; Fan JB, 2014, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V139, P699; FOYER CH, 1994, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V17, P507, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00146.x; FULLER RD, 1982, J ENVIRON QUAL, V11, P533; GIANNOPOLITIS CN, 1977, PLANT PHYSIOL, V59, P309, DOI 10.1104/pp.59.2.309; Gomez JM, 2004, J EXP BOT, V55, P119, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erh013; Gu X-H, 2010, MIDDLE E J SCI RES, V6, P556; Guo Z, 2006, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V44, P828, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.10.024; Haldimann P, 1996, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V19, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00229.x; Hameed M, 2008, FLORA, V203, P683, DOI 10.1016/j.flora.2007.11.005; HETHERINGTON SE, 1989, PLANT PHYSIOL, V90, P1609, DOI 10.1104/pp.90.4.1609; HISCOX JD, 1979, CAN J BOT, V57, P1332; Hoagland D. R., 1950, CALIFORNIA AGR EXPT, V347, P39; Hoffman G. J., 1980, Design and operation of farm irrigation systems., P145; Hu LX, 2012, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V169, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.08.020; Hu T, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066090; Huner NPA, 1998, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V3, P224, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01248-5; Jaglo KR, 2001, PLANT PHYSIOL, V127, P910, DOI 10.1104/pp.127.3.910; Jaleel CA, 2006, PLANT SCI, V171, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.03.018; Jiang YW, 2001, CROP SCI, V41, P436; Kitashiba H, 2004, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V161, P1171, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.04.008; Krause GH, 1994, ROLE OXYGEN PHOTOINH, P43; Li L, 2004, PLANT CELL REP, V22, P403, DOI 10.1007/s00299-003-0706-6; Liang YC, 2008, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V64, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.06.005; Mahajan S, 2005, ARCH BIOCHEM BIOPHYS, V444, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.abb.2005.10.018; Masood A, 2006, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V58, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.08.002; Mehta P, 2010, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V48, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.10.006; Meloni DA, 2003, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V49, P69, DOI 10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00058-8; Mhadhbi H, 2011, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V141, P201, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01433.x; Mittler R, 2002, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V7, P405, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02312-9; Munshaw GC, 2004, HORTSCIENCE, V39, P420; Nakashima K, 2006, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V126, P62, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00592.x; Parvanova D, 2004, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V42, P179, DOI 10.1023/B:PHOT.0000040588.31318.0f; PREMACHANDRA GS, 1992, J EXP BOT, V43, P1569, DOI 10.1093/jxb/43.12.1569; Rensink Willem Albert, 2005, Functional & Integrative Genomics, V5, P201, DOI 10.1007/s10142-005-0141-6; Rizhsky L, 2002, PLANT PHYSIOL, V130, P1143, DOI 10.1104/pp.006858; SARUYAMA H, 1995, PLANT SCI, V109, P105, DOI 10.1016/0168-9452(95)04156-O; SCHONER S, 1990, PLANTA, V180, P383, DOI 10.1007/BF00198790; SEEMANN JR, 1985, PLANTA, V164, P151, DOI 10.1007/BF00396077; Shinozaki K, 2003, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V6, P410, DOI 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00092-X; Sigaud-Kutner TCS, 2002, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V114, P566, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1140409.x; Silva EN, 2010, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V167, P1157, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.03.005; Sodergren E, 2001, EUR J NUTR, V40, P10, DOI 10.1007/PL00007381; STEPONKUS PL, 1984, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V35, P543, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.002551; Strasser RJ, 2000, PROBING PHOTOSYNTHES, P445; Sun YP, 2009, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V47, P347, DOI 10.1007/s11099-009-0055-y; Thomashow MF, 1999, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V50, P571, DOI 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571; Toth SZ, 2007, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V93, P193, DOI 10.1007/s11120-007-9179-8; Tsimilli-Michael M., 2008, PHOTOSYNTHESIS ENERG, P697, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-6709-9_156; Tunnacliffe A, 2007, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V94, P791, DOI 10.1007/s00114-007-0254-y; VANCAMP W, 1994, BIO-TECHNOL, V12, P165; WHITLOW TH, 1992, PLANT PHYSIOL, V98, P198, DOI 10.1104/pp.98.1.198; Xu DP, 1996, PLANT PHYSIOL, V110, P249; Yusuf MA, 2010, BBA-BIOENERGETICS, V1797, P1428, DOI 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.02.002; Zhang DF, 2001, ENVIRON GEOL, V41, P96, DOI 10.1007/s002540100348; Zhu JK, 2001, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V4, P401, DOI 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00192-8; Zhu JK, 2001, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V6, P66, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01838-0
Cited Reference Count	71
Times Cited	2
Total Times Cited Count (WoS, BCI, and CSCD)	2
Publisher	SPRINGER
Publisher City	DORDRECHT
Publisher Address	VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
ISSN	0963-9292
29-Character Source Abbreviation	ECOTOXICOLOGY
ISO Source Abbreviation	Ecotoxicology
Publication Date	OCT
Year Published	2016
Volume	25
Issue	8
Beginning Page	1445
Ending Page	1457
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)	10.1007/s10646-016-1696-9
Page Count	13
Web of Science Category	Ecology; Environmental Sciences; Toxicology
Subject Category	Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Toxicology
Document Delivery Number	EA6BU
Unique Article Identifier	WOS:000386710800001
Plants associated with this reference	Cynodon dactylon