Loading content, please wait..
loading..
Logo
Version 3.24
or
Publication Type J
Authors Mile, O., G. Lakatos and I. Meszaros
Title Photochemical activity and osmotic adjustment of some halophyte and xerophyte species in different microtopographic conditions
Source Community Ecology
Author Keywords Halophyte Mesophyll succulence Photochemical efficiency of PSII Proline accumulation Saline habitat Xerophyte ACCUMULATION PATTERN PROLINE ACCUMULATION SALT STRESS CAROTENOIDS VEGETATION TOLERANCE REGION PLANTS
Abstract The saline area of the Kiskunsag region of Hungary has varied micro-topographic conditions with different plant communities. This study was performed in a dry sandy grassland community (Potentillo arenariae-Festucetum pseudovinae Soo (1938) 1940) and a neighbouring saline sandy grassland community (Lepidio crassifolii-Puccinellietum limosae Soo (1947) 1957). These are located at different elevations and have completely different floristic composition and physiognomy due to the soil characteristics and water availability. We assessed how the different environmental conditions during summer period might alter some physiological traits of two dominant xerophytes of sandy grassland (Archillea collina L., Festuca pseudovina Hack. ex Wiesb.) and two halophytes of saline grassland (Lepidium crassfolium (W. et K.), Puccinellia limosa (Schur) Holmbg.). The relationship between soil water potential and water content showed lower water availability for plants in the saline habitat as the high water soluble Sodium content (900-2000 ppm) of this soil type limits water absorption. Both halophyte species in this Study exhibited lower K/Na ratio than xerophyte species. Between the two halophytes L. crassifolium can be described as a "leaf/shoot sodium accumulator" species while P. limosa as a "leaf sodium avoider" species. The four species differed in proline accumulation, The salt adapted species had multifold accumulation of proline as compared to species of dry sandy grassland. The three microhabitats differing in total plant cover offered different microenvironmental conditions for L. crassifolium. Proline content was twice higher in leaves of this species in the microhabitats with high soil Na+ content than in the closed microhabitat. Every species showed a transient reversible decrease of potential photochemical efficiency of PSII (F-v/F-m) at midday during the Study period. In the saline habitat the midday depression of F-v/F-m for L. crassifolium was much larger than in case of P. limosa which reflected its higher susceptibility to photoinhibition. In sandy grassland F-v/F-m of A. collina was smaller than that of F. pseudovina. Mesophyll succulence index (Sm) expressing the ratio of water content to chlorophyll content was the highest in L. crassifolium ( 1.6-2.2 g H2O mg(-1) Chl). Sm was low in xerophyte species (0.5-1.1 g H2O mg(-1) Chl), and the lowest value was found for the F. pseudovina (0.54 g H2O mg(-1) Chl).
Author Address [Mile, O.; Meszaros, I.] Debrecen Univ Med, Dept Bot, Fac Sci & Technol, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary. [Lakatos, Gy.] Debrecen Univ Med, Dept Appl Ecol, Fac Sci & Technol, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary. Meszaros, I, Debrecen Univ Med, Dept Bot, Fac Sci & Technol, Debrecen Egyetem Ter 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary. immeszaros@puma.unideb.hu
ISSN 1585-8553
ISBN 1585-8553
29-Character Source Abbreviation Community Ecol.
Year Published 2008
Volume 9
Beginning Page 131-139
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.S.18
Unique Article Identifier ISI:000263432100018
Plants associated with this reference

LEGAL NOTICES — This website is protected by Copyright © The University of Sussex, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022. The eHALOPH database is protected by Database Right and Copyright © The University of Sussex and other contributors, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022. This database is based on an earlier work by James Aronson.
THIS WEBSITE AND THIS DATABASE ARE PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, AND YOU USE THEM AND RELY ON THEM AT YOUR OWN RISK.

Contact email: halophytes@sussex.ac.uk
Credits – Tim Flowers, Joaquim Santos, Moritz Jahns, Brian Warburton, Peter Reed