Loading content, please wait..
loading..
Logo
Version 3.22
or
Authors Karagatzides, JD; Manson, HR; Tsuji, LJS
Author Full Name Karagatzides, JD; Manson, HR; Tsuji, LJS
Title Spatial distribution and performance of Scirpus americanus ramets across a temperate intertidal marsh resource gradient
Source PLANT ECOLOGY
Language English
Document Type Article
Author Keywords clonal plant; nearest-neighbor analysis; Ripley's K; spatial autocorrelation; spatial distribution; Thiessen polygons
Keywords Plus MEDEOLA-VIRGINIANA CLONES; NATURAL-POPULATION; JACK-PINE; DYNAMICS; PATTERN; GROWTH; PLANT; COMPETITION; ARCHITECTURE; ENVIRONMENT
Abstract Intertidal wetlands provide examples of plants whose performance varies in response to resource ( elevation) gradients, such as light, that are primarily determined by differences in tidal flooding. The spatial distribution ( using Thiessen polygons to delineate neighborhoods) and performance (ramet height, weight, basal perimeter, photosynthetic area and inflorescence weight) of Scirpus americanus Pers. ramets were measured for three plots in each of the high and low elevation extremes of a resource gradient on an intertidal marsh of the Fraser River Delta, British Columbia, Canada. Most neighborhood polygons in both sites were six-sided and their frequency exceeded that expected for a Poisson distribution (i.e., complete spatial randomness). The frequency distributions of polygon shapes between low and high marsh sites were not significantly different but there were more five-sided polygons than expected in the high marsh. Two-way ANOVA for polygon area revealed significant differences between sites ( p < 0.001, high marsh polygons &SIM; 40% the area of those in the low marsh and with significantly less variability) and shape ( p < 0.001, area increases with increasing number of neighbors) but the interaction effect was not significant ( p = 0.10). There were no significant correlations ( p > 0.05) between polygon area and ramet performance except for one high marsh plot that had significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlations for polygon area and ramet photosynthetic surface area, weight and basal perimeter. Moran's I and Geary's C indicated that there is generally no spatial autocorrelation for polygon shape or ramet performance as only one plot in the high marsh had a significant ( p = 0.009) negative autocorrelation for ramet height. Nearest neighbor analysis revealed a clumped distribution of ramets for two low marsh and one high marsh plot; ramets in the three remaining plots were distributed randomly. Ripley's K revealed that ramet distributions were evenly dispersed at spatial scales of &SIM; 2 cm for one plot in the high marsh and at &SIM; 12 cm for one plot in the low marsh. We conclude that the overall lack of an even distribution across this resource gradient may be due to a heterogeneous environment at a scale of centimeters, asynchronous shoot emergence throughout the growing season, and disturbance by grubbing geese.
Author Address Queens Univ, Dept Geog, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada; Ryerson Univ, Environm Appl Sci & Management Program, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada; Univ Waterloo, Dept Environm & Resource Studies, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
Reprint Address Karagatzides, JD (corresponding author), Queens Univ, Dept Geog, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Times Cited 5
Total Times Cited Count (WoS, BCI, and CSCD) 5
Publisher KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
Publisher City DORDRECHT
Publisher Address VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
ISSN 1385-0237
29-Character Source Abbreviation PLANT ECOL
ISO Source Abbreviation Plant Ecol.
Year Published 2003
Volume 169
Issue 2
Beginning Page 215
Ending Page 226
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1023/A:1026015218282
Page Count 12
Web of Science Category Plant Sciences; Ecology; Forestry
Subject Category Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry
Document Delivery Number 730JL
Unique Article Identifier WOS:000185827600005
Plants associated with this reference

LEGAL NOTICES — This website is protected by Copyright © The University of Sussex, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021. The eHALOPH database is protected by Database Right and Copyright © The University of Sussex and other contributors, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021. This database is based on an earlier work by James Aronson.
THIS WEBSITE AND THIS DATABASE ARE PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, AND YOU USE THEM AND RELY ON THEM AT YOUR OWN RISK.

Contact email: halophytes@sussex.ac.uk
Credits – Tim Flowers, Joaquim Santos, Moritz Jahns, Brian Warburton, Peter Reed