OPCW Preparatory Commission
and its PTS: A Case Study in international teamwork
By
Ian R Kenyon
(Executive Secretary 1993 - 97)
It is almost
exactly ten years since I sat, on 15 February 1993, at a borrowed
desk in the offices of the OPCW Foundation, on Noordwal in The Hague,
wondering how one set about establishing the Technical Secretariat
of a new international organisation, OPCW. The job had a particular
urgency, not just because the Chemical Weapons Convention could
enter into force any time after 12 January 1995, less than two years
away but, more particularly, because the Preparatory Commission,
at its first meeting the previous week, had decided to start its
substantive work with an expert group meeting, leaving only one
week for me to find a conference room and to set up rudimentary
conference servicing facilities. That we were able to solve this
problem and the many, much larger ones that followed was due to
teamwork from the group who came from all over the world to join
the PTS (we ultimately counted 65 different nationalities) and to
unstinting support from the members of national delegations on the
Commission and its working bodies and from the Netherlands Government
and the City of The Hague, acting through the OPCW Foundation.
In the end,
the deposit of the required 65 ratifications took longer than the
specified two years and it was April/May 1997 before the CWC entered
into force and the OPCW held its first Conference of States Parties,
organised and serviced by its own Technical Secretariat. It is a
source of great pride to me and to all the team that OPCW was able
to meet all the deadlines set out in the CWC for receipt of declarations
and for initial inspections with all the necessary infrastructure
in place. I am well aware that the Preparatory Commission was unable
to complete all the tasks laid upon it in the Paris Resolution and
that OPCW has had to find its own solutions over its first six years
of existence but at least we provided a more than adequate launching
pad.
Now that enough
time has passed to provide a certain perspective, but while most
of us are still around to remember what happened, it seems a good
time to try to capture the history and to start to analyse the lessons.
I am happy to announce that the Harvard Sussex Program, based at
SPRU Science and Technology Policy Research in the University of
Sussex in the UK, has offered to support a project for this purpose.
Daniel Feakes, who spent three years at OPCW as HSP Researcher has
agreed to take on the job of principal researcher, I shall provide
as much help as I can and the whole will be under the expert supervision
of Professor Julian Perry Robinson, who has made a lifetime study
of CBW arms control and disarmament. The Director General, Mr Pfirter,
has assured us of his support.
The next stage
will be to obtain the input of as many as possible of those who
played a part in those four years hard work; in delegations, in
the PTS, and in some cases both! We will be seeking you out where
we can find the necessary staff and delegation lists and current
contact information but please don't feel you have to wait for us.
If you would like to help by sharing your memories and opinions
please send us your contact details. We can be reached by Mail,
Fax or e-Mail at:
OPCW PC Project
c/o Harvard Sussex Program
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9QE
United Kingdom
Tel: ++44 (0)1273 87741
Fax: ++44 (0)1273 685865
e-mail: cwc-pc@sussex.ac.uk
We look forward to hearing from you and I look forward to working
with you again.
|